Add query fuzz test for PRW2#7409
Conversation
| require.NoError(t, err) | ||
|
|
||
| seed := now.Unix() | ||
| rnd := rand.New(rand.NewSource(seed)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| rnd := rand.New(rand.NewSource(seed)) | |
| rnd := rand.New(rand.NewSource(seed)) | |
| ctx := context.Background() | |
| waitUntilReady(t, ctx, c1, c2, `{job="test"}`, start, end) |
This is to ensure we get all series before testing
Signed-off-by: SungJin1212 <tjdwls1201@gmail.com>
SungJin1212
force-pushed
the
Add-fuzz-test-for-PRW2
branch
from
e7e67a7 to
1927ad8
Compare
Signed-off-by: SungJin1212 <tjdwls1201@gmail.com>
SungJin1212
force-pushed
the
Add-fuzz-test-for-PRW2
branch
from
1927ad8 to
cc1f409
Compare
|
Not sure I got why we need a query fuzz test specifically for RWv2... I think we can have a test for RWv1 vs RWv2 but no need to have any query involved. Simple vector selector should be fine. |
|
@yeya24 |
3 participants
With the introduction of PRW2, we need to ensure that the new ingestion pipeline does not introduce any query results inconsistency compared to the stable PRW1 pipeline.
This PR adds a
TestRW1vsRW2QueryFuzze2e test that verifies that the query results for PRW1 and PRW2 are identical.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Checklist
CHANGELOG.mdupdated - the order of entries should be[CHANGE],[FEATURE],[ENHANCEMENT],[BUGFIX]